Pro-environmental behaviours and protection motivation theory: a case of two universities in Bandung, Indonesia

Annisa Ritka May (1) , Anindrya Nastiti (2)
(1) Environmental Engineering Study Program, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia,
(2) Environmental Management Technology Research Group, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia

Abstract

Maladaptive behaviour towards the environment can threaten environmental conditions and this requires a more in-depth analysis. Students as part of the younger generation have the responsibility as educators, planners, and policymakers on environmental issues for a sustainable future so that research on university students’ pro-environmental behaviour is needed. This study adopted a developed causal model of pro-environmental behaviour based on Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) in a sample of 363 Indonesian university students. This theory is expected to identify barriers and impulses in carrying out pro-environmental behaviour. Based on the results, environmental attitude, self-efficacy, response costs, intrinsic and extrinsic rewards from maladaptive behaviour to the environment, and perceived severity of respondents' have a direct and significant effect on pro-environmental behaviour. In addition, perceived vulnerability has an indirect effect on pro-environmental behaviour through the level of perceived severity. Improving pro-environmental behaviour for students could be focused on environmental attitude and self-efficacy through environmental protection based on a tested causal model

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Biglari, T., Maleksaeidi, H., Eskandari, F., & Jalali, M. (2019). Livestock insurance as a mechanism for household resilience of livestock herders to climate change: evidence from Iran. Land Use Policy, 87(1). pp. 104043. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104043

Bockarjova, M., & Steg, I. (2014). Can protection motivation theory predict pro-environmental behavior? Explaining the adoption of electric vehicles in The Netherlands. Glob. Environ. Chang. 28, pp.276-288. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.010

Borden, R. J. (1977). One More Look at Social and Environmental Psychology: Away from the Looking Glass and into the Future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3(3), pp. 407–411. doi:10.1177/014616727700300309

Carvalho, N., Chaim, O., E., C., & M., G. (2018). Manufacturing in the fourth industrial revolution: a positive prospect in sustainable manufacturing. Procedia Manuf 21, pp. 671-678. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.170

Cochran, W. (1963). Sampling Techniques, second edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Dornhoff, M., & Sothman, J. (2019). Nature relatedness and environmental concern of young people in Ecuador and Germany. Front Psychology 10, pp. 453. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00453

Ertz, M., Karakas, F., & Sarigöllü, E. (2016). Exploring pro-environmental behaviors of consumers: An analysis of contextual factors, attitude, and behaviors. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3971-3980.

Janmaimool, P. (2017). Application of protection motivation theory to investigate sustainable waste management behaviors. Sustainability 9 (7), pp.1079. doi: 10.3390/SU9071079

Kaiser, F., Oerke, B., & Bogner, F. X. (2007). Behavior based environmental attitude: Development of an instrument for adolescents. Journal of Environmental Psychology 27(3), pp. 242-251. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.004

Li, D., Zhao, L., Ma, S., Shao, S., & Zhang, L. (2019). What influences an individual’s pro-environmental behavior? A literature review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, pp. 28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.024

Moerdijat, L. (2020, November 6). Pustaka Lestari. Retrieved from Lestari Moerdijat Web Site: lestarimoerdijat.com

Pazokinejad, Z., & Salehi, S. (2014). An Analysis of Social Factors Influencing Studentsâ Environmental Attitudes and Performance. Journal of Applied Sociology, 25(3), 71-88.

PDDIKTI. (2021). https://pddikti.kemdikbud.go.id/. Accessed 1 January 2020.

Rainear, A., & Christensen, J. (2017). Protection motivation theory as an explanatory framework for proenvironmental behavioral intentions. Communication Research Reports. 34 (3), pp. 239-248. doi: 10.1080/08824096.2017.1286472

Rogers R. W. (1975). A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1. The Journal of psychology, 91(1), pp. 93–114. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803

Shafiei, A., & Maleksaeidi, H. (2020). Pro-environmental behavior of university students: Application of protection motivation theory. Global Ecology and Conservation 22. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00908

Thondhlana, G., & Hlatshwayo, T. (2018). Pro-environmental behavior in student residences at Rhodes University, South Africa. Sustainability 10. doi:10.3390/su10082746

Tian, Q., & Robertson, J.L. (2019). How and When Does Perceived CSR Affect Employees’ Engagement in Voluntary Pro-environmental Behavior? Journal of Business Ethics, 155, pp. 399-412. doi:10.1007/S10551-017-3497-3

Velk, C., & Steg, L. (2007). Human behavior and environmental sustainability: problems, driving forces and research topics. J. Soc. Issues 63 (1), pp. 1-19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00493.x

Vicente-Molina, M. (2018). Does gender make a difference in pro-environmental behavior? The case of the Basque Country University Students. J. Clean. Prod. 176, pp. 89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.079

Authors

Annisa Ritka May
annisaritka@gmail.com (Primary Contact)
Anindrya Nastiti
May, A. R., & Nastiti, A. (2025). Pro-environmental behaviours and protection motivation theory: a case of two universities in Bandung, Indonesia. Jurnal Teknik Lingkungan, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.5614/j.tl.2022.28.1.4

Article Details

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.